Start with your character.
Separate the fighters you play. Compare each matchup with the win rate for the same character scope, rather than a universal 50% target.
Your characters. Your opponents. Your ranked results.
Turn the matches behind you into a clearer practice plan.
Find your own patterns.
Explore the players setting the pace.
Find the matchups that fall below your usual results. Read them alongside the sample size, then choose which fights to review.
Find your matchup prioritiesSeparate the fighters you play. Compare each matchup with the win rate for the same character scope, rather than a universal 50% target.
Look at both the gap from your baseline and how often you face that opponent character. Small samples stay visible without becoming firm recommendations.
Use the match journal, round scores and rating changes to choose fights to review in your in-game replays. Results point to a matchup; replay review explains the mistakes.
Understand personal baselines, small samples and what a community rating can tell you.
No. Search your player name, then confirm your Tekken ID and platform in the results. Names are not unique, so choose your own profile before opening the report.
No. It uses the ranked replay records returned by Wavu, a community source. Check the date range and sample size in the report; unavailable matches and offline play are not represented.
The reference is your own win rate for the selected character scope. A matchup at 59% can be below a 71% baseline. The number of games also matters: a few losses alone do not establish a lasting weakness.
No. It is Wavu’s community Glicko rating, calculated separately for each character. Rating deviation expresses uncertainty. Ratings from different regional pools are not directly comparable.
The current source provides match results, not individual hit, block or parry events. It cannot measure your high, mid or low attack effectiveness or defence. Use your in-game replays to investigate those details.